Overcoming Selfishness: Reciprocity, Inhibition, and Cardiac-Autonomic Control in the Ultimatum Game
نویسندگان
چکیده
The processes underlying decision-making in response to unfair offers in the ultimatum game (UG) have recently been discussed in light of models of reciprocity and fairness-related behavior. It has been suggested that behavior following norm-oriented, internalized expectations of reciprocity requires overcoming economic self-interest. In this study we investigated both, behavioral and peripheral-physiological indicators of inhibitory capacity related to neuronal networks that are likely to be involved in the behavioral response to unfair offers. Both heart-rate variability as an index of inhibitory capacity, and performance in a motor response inhibition task predicted rejection of unfair offers in an UG, suggesting an important role of inhibitory processes in overcoming economic temptations and regulating behavior conforming to social norms of reciprocity and fairness. The role of parasympathetic activity as a physiological trait-marker predicting inter-individual differences in the rejection of unfair offers is discussed.
منابع مشابه
To give or to keep? Affective influences on selfishness and fairness in computer-mediated interactions in the dictator game and the ultimatum game
Selfishness vs. fairness are basic dimensions of relating to others, and many computer-mediated communications among young people involve subtle decisions balancing selfishness vs. fairness. We report five experiments investigating the influence of affect on interpersonal decisions in CMC in strategic games such as the dictator game and the ultimatum game. In the dictator game, proposers have u...
متن کاملInefficiency and social exclusion in a coalition formation game: experimental evidence
This paper reports the results of experiments involving a 3-person coalition formation game with an ultimatum bargaining character. The grand coalition was always the efficient coalition, whereas the values of the 2-person coalitions are varied such that they lead to an efficiency loss in the range of 6.7 up to 30 percent. Furthermore, the 2-person coalition implies social exclusion, since the ...
متن کاملRejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity.
The strong reciprocity model of the evolution of human cooperation has gained some acceptance, partly on the basis of support from experimental findings. The observation that unfair offers in the ultimatum game are frequently rejected constitutes an important piece of the experimental evidence for strong reciprocity. In the present study, we have challenged the idea that the rejection response ...
متن کاملDoes Reciprocity Have a Dark Side? Behavior in Ultimatum Games with Multiple Proposers
We report the results of an experiment designed to explore proposer and responder behavior in an ultimatum game with non-competing multiple proposers. In contrast to a single-proposer setting, existing theories of inequality-aversion and reciprocity result in different predictions in the multiple-proposer setting. Therefore, this experiment provides an opportunity to test whether behavior in th...
متن کاملRunning head: Mood and Morality Affective influences on moral decisions: Mood effects on selfishness vs fairness
Treating others fairly and equitably is a basic requirement for moral behaviour, yet in many everyday situations the impulse to be selfish and benefit ourselves at the expense of others remains a powerful motive. This chapter reports five experiments investigating the influence of positive and negative affect on moral decisions involving the allocation of resources to ourselves vs others, using...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011